Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Review - The Affordable Smartphone That's Actually As Good As They Say - Android

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is, summarily, a phone that’s intended to offer a flagship experience on a budget and it mostly did under review. In fact, this is easily going to be one of the most recommendable handsets currently on the market. Especially for fans of the brand. That isn’t to say this phone is [...]

Read More...

The post Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Review: The Affordable Smartphone That's Actually As Good As They Say appeared first on Android Headlines.

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is, summarily, a phone that’s intended to offer a flagship experience on a budget and it mostly did under review. In fact, this is easily going to be one of the most recommendable handsets currently on the market. Especially for fans of the brand.

That isn’t to say this phone is perfect but it does fit neatly into the rest of the new A-series lineup.

Samsung may have built the Galaxy A52 5G on the same underlying software and features as the Galaxy S-series. But it costs less than half as much to pick up. So there are plenty of areas where this budget mid-ranger is going to be playing catch-up. At least compared to that other set of smartphones.

Let’s take a closer look at exactly where the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G fell below my expectations. And where it succeeded in setting new standards for its respective price bracket.

Mid-range or flagship? The hardware here says “both”

Getting the sole caveat of the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G out of the way right from the start, this phone is very clearly built from plastics. That serves, of course, as a positive and negative aspect for this smartphone but those looking for premium materials will notice the difference.

To begin with, plastics do scratch more easily than glass does. It doesn’t crack as readily tough and should be more durable against everyday wear-and-tear than flagship smartphones. And the material also allows the company to obtain a bit more fingerprint- and smudge-resistance too. Which kept the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G looking fresh throughout my review with very little maintenance.

Aesthetically, Samsung also stepped the design forward. The camera housing bump, rigidly square and appearing separated on the flagship series, is melded with the frame here. So, in hand, the device just feels a lot nicer while managing to look more unified as well. All of the hardware keys, conversely, are a low-rise design. And the ports are all polished smooth, matching the more metallic look of the frame.

On the other hand, while the bezel here is somewhat bulkier than the flagship Galaxy S-series, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G still looks incredible thanks to the punch-hole style front-camera housing. The top-edge-mounted earpiece speaker and bottom-mounted speaker grille aid with that significantly.

In terms of in-hand feel aside from the camera bump, Samsung did an excellent job with this particular handset. The casing, as noted above, is less smudgy than many other handsets. But it’s also got a smooth, but somewhat abrupt curve around all corners. And that means that it sat neatly in my hand without feeling like I might drop it. That’s despite that this handset is also somewhat more slippery than many others I’ve used.

You’ll still almost certainly want a case for this phone. If for no other reason than to protect the screen, for reasons we’ll cover in the next segment. But there’s very little, aside from the materials used, that makes this feel like a mid-range smartphone.

The ports and buttons, following in line with that, are clicky and snugly fitted. There’s no jostle in any of the buttons or plugs, to speak of and the phone’s casing feels rock-solid.

Prepare to be amazed by one of the best mid-range displays ever

Just as the standard for mid-range smartphone displays appeared to lock in at 90Hz, Samsung sent out the Galaxy A52 5G for review — with a display that’s set at 120Hz.

Of course, the company includes a way to tune that back a bit for the sake of battery — I didn’t for this write-up. And it includes customizations for color adjustments, font styles, and all the rest — as well as a comfort mode. Features such as the edge display bar and always-on display are present too. But the real kicker here is that 120Hz refresh rate.

Not only does the refresh make this phone feel buttery smooth. The screen is incredibly responsive, to begin with, but the visual side is too. All thanks to that refresh rate. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G looks good in every kind of media. Whether that’s games, movies, or day-to-day use such as messaging or web browsing.

Under review, the display on the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G was a joy to use and didn’t feel at all like a mid-range phone.

Looking beyond display refresh rate and color accuracy, this screen is also immensely bright. Especially compared to some other phones in its price range.  I was able to use the Galaxy A52 5G outdoors under bright sunlight, and even get some pictures of the screen, without any issue at all.

Indoors, adaptive brightness ensures that brightness doesn’t overwhelm. Keeping everything as natural as possible where needed. And keeping things more vibrant than might be expected, without being overbearing.

Battery life from Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is exceptionally good

When it comes to battery life, that’s impacted by screen brightness, volume levels, media use, connection status and strength, and any number of other circumstances. Setting aside how differently different apps drain a battery. So it’s important to bear in mind that’s going to be subjective. Whether for Samsung Galaxy A52 5G or any other device, my review experience will be different from yours.

With that said, I kept brightness held at around 85-percent by turning off automatic adaptive brightness. And I also kept volume effectively maxed out for my battery test and power-saving measures turned off. Regardless, the results were beyond just promising.

For my review, I listening to music and streamed media for approximately six hours. Three of those were with the screen on. I also gamed for around an hour with moderately intensive titles. And used intensive apps for around three hours, in addition to just using the gadget like a smartphone for around an hour-and-a-half.

That totaled out at around nine-and-a-half hours of screen-on time. Making matters better still, around a quarter of that was via a battery-draining 5G connection.

Overall, I also left the phone on standby for around 17-hours during my battery test. Equating to around 26.5-hours of total phone-on time during my review of Samsung Galaxy A52 5G.

Charging, unfortunately, was somewhat less impressive. Although, compared to other devices in its price bracket, the Galaxy A52 5G still performed admirably. It took 47-minutes to fill the battery to half full and just under 1.75-hours to completely full.

All of which is to say that the power-drain and delivery from Galaxy A52 5G are far above average. Even when compared to devices that cost twice as much. That’s impressive on its own, even without considering how great this phone is in other ways.

Performance from Samsung Galaxy A52 5G didn’t leave me wanting

When it comes to performance, there are a number of aspects to consider. From gaming to deeply intensive work tasks, photo-snapping or editing, and video-shooting or editing, we all expect smartphones to do a lot of different tasks of differing intensities. This, of course, is another area where Samsung Galaxy A52 5G showed that it wasn’t a flagship under review. But it’s also an area where it shines compared to many other smartphones.

Thanks in part to the display technology in use here, and in part to the upper-midrange internals, this phone is going to be a great option for those looking to game. Whether playing the latest update to Call of Duty Mobile update or testing out any number of other games across a wide assortment of genres. Summarily, Galaxy A52 5G is going to stand right alongside most smartphones on the market in most regards.

And I’d say the same about taking photos or videos, or most work tasks.

Where things begin to slow down is only in the most intensive tasks. For example, video and photo edits, particularly on the loading or processing side of things, take a bit longer to complete. Now that’s not as long as with some mid-range handsets, thanks in part to Samsung’s optimizations on the hardware front. But it is noticeable when compared to flagships.

The discrepancy, of course, is the combined result of less RAM, lesser storage, and a slower process. At least compared to top-of-the-line Android handsets. But that’s not going to be a deal-breaker for users who are already using budget or mid-range handsets. In fact, this phone seemed to pe